ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and liver-cancer-specific survival (LCSS) of elderly (≥65 years) and younger patients (< 65 years) with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMMA). Materials and Methods: From January 2002 to December 2017, 510 elderly and 1053 younger patients were diagnosed with early-stage HCC according to the Milan criteria. All of these patients were treatment-naïve to US-PMMA. Baseline characteristics were collected to identify any risk factors to determine the survival outcomes. OS, DFS, and LCSS probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the Log-rank test. Results: Complete ablation was achieved in all patients. Elderly patients were more likely to be, hepatitis C virus infection, comorbidities, cirrhosis, larger tumors, poor liver functional reservation, more ablation points, longer ablation time, longer hospital stays, and higher hospitalization costs (P < 0.05). Over the follow-up period (12–156 months), no significant differences were detected in OS, DFS, and LCSS between the two groups ( P = 0.092, 0.318, and 0.183). r-GT, ALB and ablation session were significant factors for OS, r-GT and ALB for LCSS, and cirrhosis, tumor number, AFP and ablation points for RFS in the multivariate analysis, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the two groups. Any complications were treated as appropriate. Conclusions: Although advanced age and comorbidities are intrinsic factors in elderly HCC patients, similar survival outcomes were obtained in elderly and younger HCC patients treated by US-PMWA, despite elderly patients having more comorbidities
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical prognosis of the liver transplant recipients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with microvascular invasion (MVI). Methods Clinical data of 3 447 HCC recipients undergoing liver transplantation were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of American National Cancer Institute. According to the incidence of MVI, all recipients were divided into MVI (n=376) and non-MVI groups (n=3 071). The clinical prognosis of liver transplant recipients was statistically compared between two groups by analyzing the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and liver cancer specific survival (LCSS). Relevant clinical data including age, gender, race, pathological staging, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging and MVI were recorded in two groups. The independent risk factors of clinical prognosis of HCC recipients undergoing liver transplantation were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression model. The nomogram for predicting the clinical prognosis of the recipients was delineated. The accuracy of the prediction model was evaluated by the consistency index. Results In the non-MVI group, the 1-, 3-, 5-year OS and LCSS were 93.5%, 82.1%, 75.3% and 98.3%, 93.8%, 90.7%, significantly higher than 88.8%, 72.1%, 68.4% and 95.3%, 83.1%, 80.4% in the MVI group (all P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that pathological staging, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM staging and MVI were the independent risk factors of OS and LCSS in HCC recipients undergoing liver transplantation (all P < 0.05). The nomogram consistency index was calculated as 0.624 (0.602-0.648). Conclusions MVI is an independent risk factor of the clinical prognosis of HCC recipients undergoing liver transplantation, which is significantly correlated with poor prognosis of the recipients. The nomogram based on MVI can predict the clinical prognosis of these recipients.